As wise people have said (and I have repeated) ... Black is not a color, it is a hobby!!!
And definitely the GLA was designed as an entry level car. But I think MB blew it. The GLA250 is not a young couple's entry car. It is an empty nester / grandparents' car (I'm not applying that statement to the GLA45 which is a different animal). I would have been happy to have the options of PTS (paint to sample), folding mirrors with puddle lights, under front seat storage, extra sound proofing, and many of the features found on the higher end models. Pay more? Sure. At least give the options. MB touts just in sequence manufacturing and that any combination can be built. So why not on the GLA?
Note: Many features were available in non USA cars but MB really limited what the USA could order, figuring they could sell more large SUVs by limiting the GLA (that is only my opinion).
Another note: In replacing Pam's car (Lexus Rh400) the orders I got were smaller (tight parking), sporty (handling and performance), SUV (for loading and visibility), luxury, good mileage, and a few other things. When all was said and done the GLA45 really was the only option on the market. Adding the aftermarket gas struts and under front seat cabinets helped me feel like the compromises were less.
To be fair, I think MB now better understands the market and has improved the line and offered options that were not previously allowed. For me it's too bad they had to do that with a taller vehicle. Perhaps in the future the A45 will come to our shores. MB, are you listening?