So now you're comparing the GLA's storage space to full size cars? Like I said, you seem determined to dislike this car. Why are you even in this forum? It's clear this isn't the car for you.
Perhaps you should have listed the Honda Fit as it is certainly MUCH larger. When you're only talking about a cubic foot or two though, you're only looking at the floor/seats being a couple inches deeper/further forward.
@alcatraz, regarding the Cayman, it has both fore and aft cargo areas that together equal the trunk space of a GLA. The Cayman is 425, and the GLA is 421. That's .15 cubic feet, and the Cayman's space is divided in half. Butterfield's trolling at this point. In another thread he made a crack about people being Mercedes owners to validate their success.
LOL when did the Corvette become a fullsize car, or the Ferrari FF for that matter?
This is point illustration at its finest, they're not superior because of cargo capacity, but they have MORE cargo capacity than GLA, .15 cf more or 15 cf more, MORE IS MORE
I made a crack about people buying $30,000 Mercedes to validate their success
, are you one of those people Cocles?
Why am I on this forum? Well, I have some money to spend and I'm trying to figure out the best place to spend it, could be on GLA could not be.
Is there a problem with discourse?
Is there a problem with shattering confirmation bias?
Just because I'm here doesn't mean we all have to pick the same flowers. I've been following GLA and CLA since concept and the closer they get to launch the more I'm beginning to look elsewhere. Contribute something instead of complaining someone didn't contribute what you wanted to read, beggars cant be choosers.